What's cool in the GTIA Portfolio...
Source: Concord Resolution
http://www.concordresolution.org/pupr.htm

STEPS FOR THE PRIVATE FINANCING OF OUR PUBLIC WORKS,

THROUGH THE PRIVATE BOND MARKET

Borrowing authorization article is developed by town officials (apart from a citizens’ petition), reviewed by the various committees and Selectmen, and placed on the town meeting warrant by the Selectmen.

The article is brought before town meeting.

Town meeting approves the article by at least a 2/3rds vote.

The adopted article is shown to bond counsel.

Bond counsel certifies that the approval process met all regulations and certifies the tax-exempt status of the bond.

Town treasurer prepares an official statement and notice of sale, announcing that the town wants to borrow X amount of dollars and will take bids on a certain date.

The bids are received.

The Selectmen award the bonds by voting to approve the sale and accept the rate of the lowest bidder. As part of the awarding process, the bond counsel attaches a legal opinion. This opinion is accompanied by form 8038-G, "Information Return for Tax-Exempt Government Obligation", which tells the US Treasury that the town has issued debt. By law the Treasury receives all the details of communities financial affairs.

The bonds are issued, with the stated interest rate, maturity date, and special terms, if any. This is done electronically.

Settlement: The money from the purchaser of the bonds comes into the town’s account.

Funds in hand, the town proceeds with the project.

If the money isn’t spent on schedule (in essence quickly enough), the town is liable for a penalty to the U.S. Treasury pays a penalty to the government. This is in order to keep towns from borrowing for the purpose of investing the fund themselves, rather than for the purpose of building.


STEPS FOR THE PUBLIC FINANCING OF OUR PUBLIC WORKS,

THROUGH THE PUBLIC UNITED STATES TREASURY

Borrowing authorization article is developed by town officials (apart from a citizens’ petition), reviewed by the various committees and Selectmen, and placed on the town meeting warrant by the Selectmen.

The article is brought before town meeting.

Town meeting approves the article by at least a 2/3rds vote.

State and Federal representatives are instructed to introduce legislation, directing the US Treasury to issue an “interest-free” loan to the community for its selected public works project.

The legislation to be introduced will state essentially as follows:

Note:

i) the process will be refined in discussion with state and congressional representatives;

ii) this act shall in no way be construed to limit the rights and abilities of counties and municipalities to at any time (as they may now) offer bonds, borrow from banks, or otherwise seek private sources of funding.

For those who grasp the import of this legislation, we suggest that its additional and necessary administration will be offset, vastly, by the benefits of funding our public infrastructure publicly, as opposed to with private funds. As noted previously, payments on the national debt have for many years gone almost entirely to satisfy the interest alone on that debt, while the amount of debt itself has continued to climb. This is happening in large part because Congress has failed to direct the Treasury to exercise its money-creation powers, and has instead caused the Treasury to resort to the private bond market to raise money, borrowed at interest, to renovate and build our infrastructure.

Intent of Act:

The Secretary of United States Treasury is hereby directed to make available to counties and municipalities across the nation a sum of money dedicated to the sorely needed repair and construction of our public infrastructure.

Invocation of Congressional Monetary Powers:

Such monies shall be created out of the power of Congress “To coin Money (and) regulate the Value thereof…” as stipulated in Art. 1, Sec. 8, Par. 5 of the United States Constitution. The Treasury shall not resort to borrowing such monies in the private market, whether by issuing bonds, borrowing from the private banking system, borrowing from foreign governments, or any other mode not directly based on its constitutional authority to create and regulate money as directed by Congress.

Establishment of an Independent Commission:

An independent Commission shall be established for the assessment of infrastructure needs and resource availability, and to formulate policy recommendations. The body of the Commission shall consist of twelve individuals constituted as follows:

Two members of the House of Representatives
Two members of the Senate
Two members appointed by the President
One representative of the civil engineering profession;
One representative of the public works construction industry
Two representatives of the national council of mayors
Two representatives of the nation’s counties

Each prospective Commission member shall be nominated by the body he/she represents, and presented to a joint committee of the House and Senate for confirmation. Every consideration shall be given to seek a Commission that is diverse, balanced, and non-partisan in its overall constitution. In addition, the President shall appoint a chairperson from the citizenry at large, who is not associated with any of the above groups, to preside over the Commission. This nominee shall be presented to the joint committee for confirmation.

Conduct of the Commission:

The Commission so constituted shall conduct public hearings in the interest of making an assessment of the infrastructure needs of the nation and the human and material resources available to meet them. They shall publish a detailed summary of their findings on a yearly basis.

Determination of the Fund Created:

Based on their assessment, the Commission shall arrive at the determination of the total sum of money to be created and made available for infrastructure repair and construction b the United States Treasury.

Creating Policy Guideline Recommendations:

The Commission shall formulate recommendations for policy guidelines by which funds would be allocated.

Submission of Recommendations for Legislation:

On a yearly basis, the Commission shall submit its recommendations, both as to the sum of money to be created, and policy guidelines by which it would be allocated, to the Congress for implementation through legislation.

Executive of Legislative Mandate by Executive Branch:

The Executive Branch shall establish an office within the Department of Treasury which would administer the equitable dispersal of funds according to policy guidelines legislated by Congress, up to the limit of monies created.

Application by Counties and Municipalities:

Counties and municipalities, which are awarded interest-free loans, will receive direct payment out of the Treasury. Reasonable regulations to guarantee that the monies are used for the purposes applied for, and not diverted, unduly delayed in utilization, or otherwise abused shall apply.

Cost of Administration:

Money to cover the cost of administration of the loan process shall be assessed and attached to each loan. Guidelines for establishing reasonable fees shall be part of the Commission’s recommendation and Congressional legislation process. This fee will not be in the form of a compounding interest assessment.

Views: 0

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

For many years, we have been talking and writing about this line of demarcation between private and public. After all, don't we all have a private and public aspects to our chractacter. Is it really, any of your concern how many men that I've slept with? Remember, the question was not whether or not I had sex? Just to make the record perfectly clear, the answer is nun...

Why do they call it history, it's her story, as well (more at water than oil?)... It should be called ourstory.

But all Carless Joe Kin, aside, "private" financing of "public" works becomes a racket when:

1.) the bond issuers/dealers and investors make a profit off property tax payers (which includes renters)...
2.) the so-called "public works" projects are not optimal (i.e. do not maximize the "utils" ;-)) of the most public of our people, that is the most needy).
3.) When private interests feed at the trough of ill-conceived pork barrel projects that do not maximize/optimize the benefits to the people and our environment(s), and maximize the profits of a relative few (i.e. architects, real estate dealers, lawyers, large contractors, construction supply firms, etc.).

It has become public knowledge among far too few, I guess, but public subsidy to private interest has been the rule not the exception, especially since the days of Reagan. Read Harrison and Bluestone's book (I forget the title) or Robert Goodman's second book, if you are not already initiated and sufficiently outraged at the concept and the history.

It was bad enough that the supply siders were chanting "governments hands off" while they were raping our mother earth and our honest brothers harder than anybuddy has ever been raped before, but at the same time they were taking government hand outs. Also, you may or may not be aware they were increasing government payments to the military industrial complex, allowing very sick little American boys and girls? to develop and produce drones and other very twisted real robotic genocidal equipment, based on their practice at the video screen.

Just a SMALL case of AGGRAVATED RAPE AND MURDER, and the United States of America is about as guilty as they could get!!!

Over.


Mike Morin
Public financing of Public Works would seem to be the most logical of all decisions since otherwise private financing would be the condoning of the old MASS Turpike Toll Road that gave way to tolls so far beyond the period that it was supposed to end.

To the extent that private financing becomes little more than privatization disguise to forever incur the benefits and profits of the public works service, it is institutional slavery through private corporations designed to perform the service that the public must perpetually pay for, and pay to. It is economic slavery.

The only method of avoiding this institutional economic slavery through taxation (for which private corporations typically receive subsidies in the first place through tax credits, tax foregiveness, or woe to us, tax incentives in the form of tax payments - is to adopt a higher and stricter obligation on the part of privatizers (a.k.a., privateers of public resources) - or to fund purely from public funding and expect accoutability. In order to do that, one needs a solid and legitimate economic system that provides stability, accountability, and disclosure - which society has not yet invested in to any great degree.
What about having communities invest in their own infrastructure directly? Then reap the benefits of revenue generated thereafter - sort of like microloans, with a significant return to whomever decides to invest.
Jared et al,

The problem is more structural than that, the USA has a sordid history of local and regional colonialism where the rich people, who control both the Private and Public Resources, make decisions solely to line their Capitalist pockets, at great expense to working people and the environment.

I have a 25 page concise comprehensive ecosocialist plan based on local ecological economic redevelopment, inter-community, inter-regional, and world unity and cooperation, which includes consideration of various "infrastructures", particularly resource allocation (in lieu of finance), transportation and energy.

The basic principles of this plan are inclusion, humanity, equity, quality of life, sustainability and peace.

If you would like a copy to share, translate, disseminate, and otherwise use, write to me at:

mlarosamorin@earthlink.net or
wiserunion@earthlink.net or
peoplesequityunion@earthlink.net


Thank you.


In Peace, Friendship, Cooperation, and Solidarity,

Mike Morin

RSS

ALL-Transition Global Search

Loading

Members -- Welcome the Family!

TRANSITION IN ACTION SOCIAL NETWORK is a social network

© 2013   Created by Les Squires.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service