What's cool in the GTIA Portfolio...
Most of the problems encountered in modern society can be attributed in some way to money. Poverty is a result of having too little or no money and the dangerous balance of power that leads to oppression is a result of too much money at the disposal of too few people. Money can be manipulated in ways which accumulate debts and its distribution is grossly uneven.

This is because money is a fictional token of value. The value is assigned to the token so that even the value is fictional because the tokens have no intrinsic value. But we have become so addicted to this concept that, even when we are looking for alternatives that will take the dangerous levels of power away from the banks, we look to alternative versions of exactly the same thing: local currencies. The heart of this idea is in the right place but the level of innovation does not go nearly far enough.

We must ask: what do we want our economic model to do for us? Forget, for the moment, the idea of a unit of exchange and look at the essential role of economic models. We want to ensure that every member of society is individually rewarded for their contribution to society. That's it. We want to ensure that the members of society have access to the benefits of society and that each individual earns the right to those benefits.

The unit of exchange was a good idea when it was introduced around 700BC... but surely we have moved on somewhat since then! Basically, money is simply an abstract version of the barter system. It is a very simple concept despite the complexities that now apply to economics that manipulate the ways in which transactions can be undertaken to such a degree that even the fictional face value of money is volatile.

The mistake, of course, is in assigning a fictional 'token' value to something that (a) has no intrinsic value and (b) can be freely exchanged. This applies equally to local currencies.

In 2009, Gordon Brown made a speech about what he referred to as a "value-based economy".  The speech itself was little more than hot air flatulating in spin and soundbites from a dying dinosaur. Nothing new was on offer. But the term "Value-Based Economy" struck a chord with me. What entities have true, intrinsic value? People, products and services. What I am proposing here is a complete departure from the idea of a unit of exchange. Instead, I propose fixed units of value linked directly to the services and products that society needs and the people who provide them. The main difference between this concept and the unit of exchange concept is that money is essentially a very simple (and primitive) concept that has become extremely complex in application. What I propose is complex (and more sophisticated) in essence and extremely simple in application.

All businesses must have a "bottom-line", which is the point at which the business breaks even with no losses or gains. Society, too, must establish a "bottom-line" but with a slightly different angle. Society's bottom line must be assured survival for everyone within the community. If we fall below that level (and we are currently WAY below that level), society is on a downward path to extinction. Above that level, society is in a state of growth. That bottom line is where society ticks over with neither loss nor gain and, as with any business, this level is not indefinitely sustainable but it must be our starting point.

So the bottom line is that the community provides adequate housing, adequate nutritious food, serviceable clothing, clean water, energy for heating, cooking and lighting and access to public transport, education and public health care for every family or single member of the community by default. No one has to earn this. This, of course, will require considerable manpower and resources and this must be assigned a value. Value is based on need, time and take up.

Because the 'need' element is assessed as essential, this is assigned the highest level of value. Because the take-up will be 100% of the community, this is also afforded the highest level of value. Each of the resources is also linked to a fixed value rated as essential. This calculates as a given figure. Every individual employed in the provision of these essential services will have a base value linked to their identity according to the level of skill required to perform their roles. This Base Value figure is then used to calculate the value of one hour of working in the provision of the service. Each hour worked earns a given number of Redeemable Value Points (RVPs) established by the base value of the individual.

RVPs can be 'spent' in return for other, non-essential services such as more exotic foods, more stylish clothing, nicer homes, entertainment and so on. However, for these to be of any value, these non-essential products and services must be available and this is where  entrepreneurial skills and innovation come into force. A good business idea is set out with an estimated percentage of the community likely to use the products or services. The value to the community is assessed and the idea is awarded a provisional base value. This figure identifies how many RVPs can be generated in order to procure the resources necessary to establish the business. A provisional base value is then assigned to each of the personnel according to the level of skill. After a year, the business is reviewed and given a fixed base value according to performance and this is reflected in the fixed base value of each of the personnel.

Businesses can grow and individuals are rewarded for their input. RVPs can be redeemed by 'purchasing' services or products and this is how it would work:

(A) wants to buy a computer from (B)'s computer store. The computers are supplied by (C) computer manufacturers. (A) chooses a computer priced at (X) TVPs. The price is the base value of the product and will always remain a fixed price. The store deducts (X) RVPs from (A)'s base value account. This does not affect the base value of (A) but simply reduces the number of available RVPs. The base value account is not a 'bank account' because there are no banks as such. (A) is his or her own bank in this respect. The appropriate number of RVPs is then added to the base value account of the store. When the store has its annual review, the number and value of transactions are calculated to provide a new base value for the business, which is then fixed for another year. The base value of each individual working in the store is then adjusted accordingly. When (B)'s computer store restocks from (C) computer suppliers, the value of the transactions are transferred to the supplier.

In this way, businesses grow according to their value to the community and personal wealth grows according to value to the community. This provides an incentive to every business and individual to provide as much value to the community as possible. However, the base value can never be transferred. RVPs are simply records linked directly to the businesses or individuals to which they apply. They cannot be loaned or borrowed (or stolen). One cannot gamble with them or trade with them as is done with international currencies. They have no intrinsic value and exist only as a record of earned entitlement to products and services.

This takes banks out of the equation. This takes taxation out of the equation. Value cannot be manipulated in the way that money is and value is not volatile but fixed.

With our current system, the price of a loaf of bread can vary from one day to the next according "market forces" but its value always remains constant. The value of a loaf of bread is the same now as it was in Biblical times. Value is reality whereas "price" is a fluctuating fiction. We cannot continue to be at the mercy of an economy based on a fluctuating fiction. it is unsustainable, to which the current economic crisis testifies.

It takes imagination to look at a heap of stones and see them as loaves of bread. It takes insanity to starve because we don't have enough stones!

This idea is just a basic possible alternative to illustrate that we can live in a moneyless society and still enjoy the prospect of reasonable wealth but without the fear of crushing poverty. Businesses can still enjoy growth but without the dangerous levels of corporate power currently exercised by companies that pollute and exploit with only the interests of their shareholders to consider. There may be many other workable alternatives and I don't doubt that others will have other ideas and better ideas. The only rule is that economies must be based on true value.

Why is gold valuable? Because it is scarce.
Does it matter that it is scarce? No
Why does it not matter that it is scarce? Because gold is too soft for most applications of metal and it is too heavy for practical use. Its use is limited to jewellery and, in small quantities, to technology.
So what is the value of gold to society? Minimal
So why is gold valuable?

In real terms, iron has far more value to society than gold because it has more essential uses. Glass is far more valuable to society than diamond because it has more essential uses and on it goes. The market value of minerals such as diamonds and gold are volatile because their value is fictional. Their real intrinsic value is minimal. So a currency based on something like the Gold Standard is also a fiction. We must base our economy on stable values that do not fluctuate with market forces

Tags: alternatives, economy

Views: 473

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I belong to a Community Exchange System (CES) or LETS, which uses a public owned barter/payment system that cannot inflate or lose value. The world at large uses the current FIAT money system controlled and inflated by banks. Given these two definitions (LETS and FIAT) the following:

 One of the difficulties with trying to replace FIAT money is that so many services and necessities still require FIAT money. One strategy to facilitate the move towards non-fiat-money it would be required that a CES or LETS society grow their own food, educate their children, mine their own resources etc. This is not always possible.

Another strategy is that the LETS could interact with a global economy; they should have some things of value to export to the money economy, be those crops, minerals or such. The trading to FIAT money markets should then strive to balance the import and export trade to keep a zero balance of FIAT currency, i.e. no paper money is kept. This will prevent any loss through inflation since the LETS community has only products that are valued for their real worth.

On a personal level, this is something any individual could do. First try to replace all FIAT transactions with LETS. If you have FIAT money, buy land or technology that gives you the ability to produce something of value to the FIAT money world. Whenever you have an excess of FIAT money, invest it in things with intrinsic value again.

Inside the LETS, we need to set up things like shops, import and export (to FIAT) etc. to serve the LETS customers. These shops could sell to FIAT customers as well, allowing us to buy stock etc. in FIAT currency.

If we do this as a community we will be more successful than if we try to do this on our own. Anyone aware of such projects?

The problems we do tend to run up against is lack of support for alternative systems. Societies are kind of addicted to the concept of financial wealth... even though the system is geared to ensure that the majority within society never attain sufficient wealth to release them from debt. We are told that wealth is acquired by hard work but the people who promote this idea are the people who inherit their capital and expand it by investment rather than actually working for it. There are those who acquire wealth by hard work but the sacrifices (family life etc.) never justify it.

It will be a mammoth task to really ingrain the understanding that as much as you need is all the wealth anyone can possibly attain. Excessively wealthy people measure their wealth by the amount they have beyond their needs. This is purposeless wealth. If Bill Gates gave up business and dedicated the rest of his life to spending the money he has, he would never be able to get through it all no matter how extravegant he was... yet it still isn't enough! This is the mindset we are up against. People are hoping for their 'Big Break': to make in business, to come up with the next Big Idea, to be a rock star, to win the lottery. The majority of people are disatisfied because they feel they are failures if they don't have more than they need.

Since first posting this discussion, it has become clear that there are a number of realistic and workable alternatives to the present system. But the system we have is like a merry-go-round that is spinning too fast. Those that want to get off feel that they can't or are afraid to try.

Does anyone have any ideas about re-educating society? We need a critical mass to be determined to depart the debt-based system in order to get alternatives in place. The current system is reinforced by TV, movies, advertising, politics and even law. What we're up against reminds me of the Peter Sellers film: The Mouse That Roared in which a small independent country invades America with bows and arrows.

Don't give up. There is a long list of writers who deeply understand this, to list a few, in no particular order, David Korten, Ellen Brown, Charles Eisenstein, James Gustave Speth, Thomas Greco, Michael Hudson, Mike Nickerson, Chris Martenson, Nicole Foss, etc.

To understand and appreciate why money and wealth is illusionary we must look at the difference between communal or societal wealth and individual wealth.

Communal wealth is like a pool of accumulated surplus. We all contribute to this pool by working and being productive.

Individual wealth is when we each put a claim to a portion of this communal wealth - some claims are larger than others.

In reality, the total sum of all claims far outstrip the total value of communal wealth, i.e. our paper claims (money) are practically worthless.

Money is created as loans provided by banks, which is then used to pay the interest on loans. Thus lending institutions in essence create their own money which then becomes their claim to the communal pool. The bottom line is all money is a claim on the productivity of future working people... no more than a form of modern indentured labor or slavery.

The solution is to separate the function of money as a means of exchange from that of money as a store of value and a means of earning interest and profit.

Money, like laws and guns, is a fabrication of society as an instrument for societal organization. He who controls the money, laws and guns controls the working people.

RSS

ALL-Transition Global Search

Loading

Members -- Welcome the Family!

TRANSITION IN ACTION SOCIAL NETWORK is a social network

© 2013   Created by Les Squires.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service