We are a global alternative currency using 'Life Dollars', operational since 2004. We have 950+ members actively participating. Over 11,000+ exchanges valued at well over three quarters of a million USD to date.
Website: http://www.lifedollars.org
Group Type: Local Currencies & Trading
Members: 13
Latest Activity: Apr 1, 2011
Started by Heather K. Last reply by Heather K Feb 17, 2011. 1 Reply 0 Likes
The Portland branch of Community Exchange Network/PDX at www.community-exchange.org. is interested in coordinating with FourthCornerExchange(FCE) in…Continue
Loading feed
Comment
Comment by Ron Tocknell on April 1, 2011 at 8:49am
Comment by Ron Tocknell on December 27, 2010 at 1:28pm As much as I prefer the idea of local currencies to bank-issue currencies, they are still based on the same concept introduced around
700BC: a unit of exchange. The problem I have with this is
that it involves assigning a fictitious value to a token that has no
intrinsic value. The problem here is that the face value has to be an
invention and, therefore, its value can go up or come down. It is
potentially as volatile as any other bank-issue currency.
I think we can do better than this.
What do we want our economy to do for us? Essentially, we want to ensure
that those who contribute to society are rewarded for their input with
some means of entitlement to the benefits of society. But what about
those who do not contribute? Do we want them to starve to death?
Resources and labour are only expensive because of the system of currency we use.
If, instead of having a unit of exchange that can be loaned and return
an interest (and, consequently lead to debt), how about establishing a
value to each and every product and service according to its value to
society. This is a base value that is consistent.
The price of a loaf of bread can vary from one day to the next but the value of a loaf of bread is the same today as it was in Biblical times. So value is clearly more stable than price.
People are also valuable so they should have a base value that entitles them
to food, basic housing, serviceable clothing, clean water, basic health
care, education, energy for heating, lighting and cooking and access to
public transport by default... ie; without having to earn it. This is the base value of a human being in a humane society.
There are many industries that provide non-essential services that make life
more meaningful and most people will want to be able to participate in
these. So, by contributing our skills and time in service to the
community, we can upgrade our base value to entitle us to these
additional services and products. The overall "currency" is the value
of the whole society. An individual's wealth is determined by that
individual's value to society. The greater the contribution, the more
benefits one can access. This can be in the form of points
that are earned at an hourly rate and canceled against transactions.
But the points cannot be loaned or borrowed or gambled or inherited or
bequeathed (or stolen) because they are simply a record of the value of
an individual's input and the value of goods and services to which they
are entitled. The value is linked directly to products, services and
the people who provide them.
But the points have no intrinsic value independent of the item, service or individual to which they apply.
This is a simplistic sketch but it would address poverty, corruption,
financial theft and banks would be obsolete. Value would remain constant
and only subject to change if the value in real terms changes. If a
person upgrades their base value then that is a real term change. If a
loaf of bread has sun-dried tomatoes added, then that is a real term
change.
At the moment, our economy is based on a unit of exchange with a fluctuating, fictitious value. It doesn't matter
whether it's a dollar, a pound, a euro, a Life dollar, a Baltimore Buck,
a Delaware Dime or whatever. They would all be tokens with a fictitious
value and open to abuse. Assign realistic value to items, services and
people that reflect true intrinsic value and you have a stable economy.
Of course, the banks won't like it.
Comment by Matthew Slater on October 7, 2010 at 7:58pm
Comment by Matthew Slater on October 7, 2010 at 7:12pm
Comment by Matthew Slater on October 7, 2010 at 5:20pm
Comment by Collin Ferguson on September 24, 2010 at 11:31am TRANSITION IN ACTION SOCIAL NETWORK is a social network
© 2013 Created by Les Squires.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Fourth Corner Exchange to add comments!